Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inserting Multiple Arithmetic Means

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per G1. soum (0_o) 04:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting Multiple Arithmetic Means (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article is non-sense. It basically creates a new, or seldom-used, term for "multiple" arithmetic means, and then gives some elementary trivia about it. In essence, it outlines a way to create an arithmetic sequence with n terms lying between two given numbers, and calls the intermediate terms the "arthimetic means" of the two numbers. Not only is this WP:OR, it's trivial OR. Any high school math student can do this, and such a process is covered in any basic math class. There's nothing unique, notable, or important about this process - and the "theorem" given there is not only a duplication of a well-known result on arithmetic sequences, but it's WP:OR to boot. Haemo 02:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:OR. Even a redirect wouldn't work; this title will never be searched. Sr13 (T|C) 02:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree with the nom that this is trivial original research. --Metropolitan90 02:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note - I previously tried to speedy it, but my tag was removed by the creator without comment. --Haemo 03:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.