Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Job Productions (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Inside Job Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
close to no improvement to this spammy article since the last AfD. very little third party coverage [1], noting there is a company with the same name in London. LibStar (talk) 03:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonnotable local theatre production co. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —LibStar (talk) 02:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.