Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inspection management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inspection management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appreciate there's a lot of interesting content here, but it is unencyclopedic and more of an essay. Totally unsourced with an excessive focus on India, and even if that was dealt with the content should all be included in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_theory.

Incidentally, the essay-type style and use of phrases like "the author while working for his company" make me wonder if this is a copyvio. I can't find any sign of the original online though, so it may have been written for WP. If so, it is original research. Korruski^Talk 22:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete without prejudice to selective merge/redirect as WP:ESSAY with WP:UNDUE focus on India and a biblical parable, and a section of WP:NOTHOW at the end too. Ansh666 04:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - unsourced essay. - MrOllie (talk) 10:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.