Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstallShield (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Nominator should read last AfD. I also note nominator is (believed to be) inexperienced when it comes to looking for reliability and notability of an article. (non-admin closure) Nordic Nightfury 08:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

InstallShield

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

InstallShield is not notable as installshield does not get much coverage it does it warrent an article on wikipedia Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. This article was kept at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstallShield in June 2016 after its notability was demonstrated to the unanimous satisfaction of all the participants. The new nomination does not provide any reason why we should reverse the unanimous finding of the previous AfD. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Given the recent AfD with such a clear keep consensus, this second AfD is baffling. --Michig (talk) 07:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.