Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instarea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 19:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instarea

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Instarea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this company passes WP:NCORP. Most of the coverage listed looks like routine business activity or non-notable awards or lists of companies (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) and the Medium piece is an interview (so not an independent source). shoy (reactions) 14:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 18:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete sourcing does not show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is in passing, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.