- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TravellingCari 18:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Int C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Future software, currently not notable. VG ☎ 01:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 01:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability. The title of the language makes it almost impossible to find using a Google search, so it's hard to know if there's any articles about there which could show that it's notable. Bill (talk|contribs) 01:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - while future software could be notable if covered by third party sources, that isn't the case here. --ZimZalaBim talk 02:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll find sources for this project. It's a small project, so sources are scarce
Iphoneorange (talk) 04:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, speedy would have worked. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If I read A7 correctly speedy deletion does not apply to software. Unless you think some other criteria applies. VG ☎ 17:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.