Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intalex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Intalex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company launched five months ago. There are a couple of independent sources, but they don't really cover the subject in sufficient depth to pass WP:ORGDEPTH. A large part of the article is merely an exhaustive list of product features.- Mr X 17:35, 9 July 2014 (UTC) - Mr X 17:35, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 17:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 17:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Its looks like an advertisement to me; WP:NOTADVERTISING - Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and per Rameshnta909. Snappy (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's an interesting idea, but at this point, the coverage is scant, and insufficient to meet notability. No prejudice to recreation in the future if this catches on. -- Whpq (talk) 16:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly a vanity article, as the user who created it has no other contributions. MiracleMat (talk) 03:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Vanity piece, created by possible COI SPA. Murry1975 (talk)@

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.