- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted by Friday. Arkyan • (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Integer donuts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Trivial, unencyclopedic subject. GregorB 22:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax. Abeg92contribs 23:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Silly, useless neologism. Delete it. Zetawoof(ζ)
- Delete. Unencyclopaedic, etc. Also delete Integer aardvark through Integer Zebra should they appear. -R. S. Shaw 02:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Zetawoof. Let's be rational, this new term just isn't natural, so the article should be deleted in whole. —C.Fred (talk) 02:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unencyclopaedic, possibly a hoax. BlackBear 16:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is a cultural reference that signifies a common feeling in many offices. There just had not been a unifying term for these feelings until now. If you believe it is unencyclopaedic it should be edited, not deleted. With the rise in workplace illnesses, threats of biological and corporate terrorism, and the general poor health of the cubicle residing workplace populace; terms like integer donuts will become more commonplace. Not only will they become more common, they will be become more important to our wellbeing and safety. -DES2928 19:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonsense sourced from an internet forum. Gazpacho 23:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SpeedyDelete patent nonsense Rackabello 05:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Delete as unencyclopedic nonsense. -- The Anome 08:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nonsense -- Whpq 17:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.