Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated Environmental Solutions (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Integrated Environmental Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. Media mentions are trivial. Previous deletion discussion was speedily closed due to being nominated by a banned user. —Chowbok ☠ 00:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another back office software firm, this one selling to architects. Note also that the page reads like advertising and, as is typical, promises vague benefits without specifics: a company that develops software simulation tools which assist architects, engineers, facilities managers and all those involved in the development and management of building design, in creating healthier built environments.... provides step-by-step navigation that defines different sustainable design analysis processes by weaving a workflow through IES’ <Virtual Environment>. The software allows users to undertake complex environmental performance analysis without the need of expert knowledge.... taking designs to a more detailed level, with highly graphical outputs. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.