Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated floating cage aquageoponics system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated floating cage aquageoponics system

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With respect to the possibility that this just fails to be indexed by Google, but I could hardly find any Google hits. 46 in total, including facebook, Wikipedia and Wikinews. The system is developed in 2013, so it has a strong smell of promotion but at present fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 20:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I can see at least three references from reliable sources in the article, [1], [2], [3], all of them have indepth coverage about the topic. Passes WP:GNG. --Zayeem ^(talk) 17:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per User:Kmzayeem. Foreign language sources are valid and may not readily appear in a Google search. ~KvnG 14:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I know that. That is why I put on the disclaimer With respect to the possibility that this just fails to be indexed by Google, (...). Is there an alternative way for searching in texts in non-European letter types? I would love to know that... The Banner talk 16:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Kmzayeem. Google indexing or internet availability of sources is not the only ground of notability. – nafSadh did say 16:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.