Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated telecom power unit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Integrated telecom power unit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. Originally meant to promote an individual company — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just a definition stub, no references. RJFJR (talk) 17:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No references, no indication of notability. From a technical technical terminology review standpoint, it's just one company's particular name for a particular combination of common functions.North8000 (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.