Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrity (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Integrity (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It reads like an advert. I've been trying to fix it, but many of the sections like "Requirements Management" are simply unsalvageable. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 20:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is highly promotional. But worse, it seems like a duplicate of the MKS Integrity article. MKS Integrity is less promotional and has some secondary sources, such as the Forrester and CM crossroads refs, so I would recommend keeping the MKS Integrity article and deleting this one. It is not clear if there is anything useful to merge in from the present article. --Mark viking (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JayJay^{What did I do?} 01:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Advertisement for software to help people make software. No showing of historic significance for this product. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.