Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual Progressionism
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was CSD'd as nocontext, but I think it does have some, therefore giving full AfD. [Check Google hits]; 0 total. Seems like totally NN philosophy to me, included just to promote itself. (|-- UlTiMuS 01:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable neologism. Mak (talk) 01:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: non-notable neologism. Looks like something made up in college one day. Article admits "Intellectual Progressionism's" own nascient status, and therefore its non-notability. Rohirok 03:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable, may be a self-promotion site for Trevor Fregin. --Shirahadasha 03:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable, and possibly a hoax - note Intellectual progressionism is a redirect to it --ArmadilloFromHell 05:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a neologism and a possible hoax. Nuke the redirect if this gets deleted. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 07:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not really philosophy, and as Rohirok notes, the article itself admits the novelty of the concept. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable, likely vanity. Dlyons493 Talk 22:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.