Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntelliCAD Technology Consortium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to IntelliCAD. No consensus to delete, but not a single 'keep' also, so merge. I did a brute force merge, please help clean up. (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntelliCAD) - Nabla (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IntelliCAD Technology Consortium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Full disclosure: This article has been the target of a long lasting spam campaign. That is not a valid reason for deletion. This consortium failing to meet WP:ORG however is a valid reason for deletion, and I am unable to confirm that this subject has received coverage in reliable, independent third party publications. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 17:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the reasons in my nomination above. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the article had no secondary sources, just the consortium's own website. The article consists mainly of information about the consortium's products, very little about the consortium itself. Northwestgnome (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 19:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 19:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not seeing much that ins't a press release. IntelliCAD is already up for Afd: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntelliCAD with a possible merge here, which will need to be addressed. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 21:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• You guys have far too much time on your hands. Delete the article? Can't find any sources? What a bunch of bullshit. If this were the AutoCAD Article you wouldnt be complaining. IntelliCAD has just as much right to be here as any other valid CAD product. Get a life. http://search.cadalyst.com/results.php?cx=008600089690839190750%3Af7ucb4sfdoq&q=intellicad&cof=FORID%3A9#1371 http://www.google.com/custom?domains=worldcadaccess.typepad.com%3Bwww.upfrontezine.com&q=intellicad&sitesearch=worldcadaccess.typepad.com&client=pub-3390771493678065&forid=1&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&safe=active&flav=0000&sig=R1eh-eMkuHgRr-gi&cof=GALT%3A%23006688%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23336699%3BVLC%3A663399%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3A006688%3BALC%3A0000FF%3BLC%3A0000FF%3BT%3A000000%3BGFNT%3A006688%3BGIMP%3A006688%3BLH%3A50%3BLW%3A205%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.upfrontezine.com%2Fwca.jpg%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2F%3BFORID%3A1&hl=en —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadrules (talk • contribs) 15:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC) — Cadrules (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Merge - OK, I can't see many reliable sources *about the organization*, but I can about it's (sole?) product, IntelliCAD. I would say that one of these two articles should be kept, and I suspect that it is the IntelliCAD one. For example, both the links mentioned above by cadrules appear to help the notability of the product, not the organization. Wrs1864 (talk) 22:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge, No-one (including myself) seems to be able to find a single, independent source for this company, and thus fails WP:ORG. However, there seems to be no problem finding independent and reliable sources for the product. So stick in the info on the "technology consortium" into the IntelliCAD article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 10:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per wrs1864 and arsenikk to [[IntelliCAD] Dimitrii (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.