Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Collaboration Transparency
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Intelligent Collaboration Transparency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research and not notable. Has been tagged since 2009, and this tag and associated discussion still apply. Krushia (talk) 20:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 12:55, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found no reliable secondary sources to support the claim of notability. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 09:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent sources found. -—Kvng 05:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.