Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interest in securities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interest in securities

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Interest in securities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete Fails WP:NOTE, cannot find any sources that show this is a term that is used notability in economics. Reads more like a WP:DICTDEF. Tooncool64 (talk) 23:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Economics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of GNG; specifically it is unsourced, and I am unable to find RS with a secondary analysis the concept. If it's even a real term of art, the article is a DICTDEF. Cheers Last1in (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete vague, non-notable, NEO at best. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 22:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a WP:DICTDEF. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.