Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interfusigrating

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interfusigrating (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Per Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms#Articles_on_neologisms Oore (talk) 01:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete per WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP. Plus, the only Ghits are for Neil Charlet (presumably the article creator) and his website. nneonneo ^talk 01:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete. This ugly neologism was made up this month. Enough said. AnturiaethwrTalk 02:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per the creator's username, it was made up by the person who created the article, therefore WP:MADEUP. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO.--Berig (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete dogcrap. JuJube (talk) 08:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.