Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Download Manager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Shimeru (talk) 07:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Download Manager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find any significant coverage of this software product. Non-notable. Haakon (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Reviews by CHIP ([1] (translation)), Softpedia ([2]), and PC Magazine ([3], [4]) establish notability. — Rankiri (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It's an excellent program that I have used. I used it to rip whole websites selectively to my hard drive. I have no doubt there are plenty of sources. Szzuk (talk) 21:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep It need sources to improve article quality. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 11:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.