Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Infidels (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. See no reason to waste time on what appears to be a bad faith nomination. (Non-admin close, though I used to be one.) Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Internet Infidels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
fails WP:CORP RucasHost 09:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep Notable organisation, that's been around since '95, 600K visitors a month, numerous articles published, many of them cited here. Bad faith nom by probable sockpuppet of banned user. ornis (t) 09:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A simple IP check will prove that I am not a sock-puppet. ConfuciusOrnis has been harassing me because he is intolerant of those who do not share his beliefs. --RucasHost 09:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- IP check proves nothing. ornis (t) 09:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, either way, I am not a sock-puppet. --RucasHost 09:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- IP check proves nothing. ornis (t) 09:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Furthermore, there are no sources to back-up the alleged 600,000 visitors a month. The alexa rank paints quite a different picture. --RucasHost 09:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A simple IP check will prove that I am not a sock-puppet. ConfuciusOrnis has been harassing me because he is intolerant of those who do not share his beliefs. --RucasHost 09:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per last consensus reached --Childzy ¤ Talk 09:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per result of first AfD. Wl219 10:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep Notable organisation. Sophia 10:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep result of first AFD was speedy keep. Nominator fails to highlight what has changed since then to make another AFD worthwhile. --Oscarthecat 10:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.