Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Relay Chat channel operator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Relay Chat channel operator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet the requirements of wp:notability. there are no third party, reliable sources in this article. Theserialcomma (talk) 22:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I can't find any reliable sources to show notability, which I think is a bit odd, so please let me know if they turn up! Bigger digger (talk) 19:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete wow, this topic doesn't need a stand alone article. Mentioning on Internet Relay Chat will work. Also no source—Chris!_c/t 01:07, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. --Nuujinn (talk) 19:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.