Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intertec systems
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Intertec systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
nn business. No independent coverage; a bunch of awards of questionable notability. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:57, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NOTADVERTISING...Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: recreation of Intertec Systems, which was speedily deleted three times. LittleWink (talk) 22:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Press releases regarding inclusion in local reseller lists are not evidence of encyclopaedic notability and my searches are finding nothing better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 11:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete & salt due to persistent recreation. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.