This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August ☎ 23:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable neologism. No evidence of widespread usage. 585 google hits. By comparison, the neologism glomp (also up for vfd right now) gets 1.4 million google hits. Gamaliel 20:04, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]