Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intranational conflict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, userfy and redirect. - Daniel.Bryant 08:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intranational conflict (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Completely unsourced, reads like an essay and is better dealt with at ethnic conflict, civil war, etc. Cordless Larry 14:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and copy/move to the creator's sandbox. No citation or sources and seems as if this article is a work in progress by its author. Works in progress are fine, but not in the main namespace. Also redundant to the articles referenced by the nom, but if the author is willing to work on improving articles about internal violent struggles, s/he may wish to use some of this text in doing so. -Markeer 16:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and userfy per above. However, also redirect to civil war for the time being. Though most ethnic conflicts are intranational, not all are so, and in any case intranational ethnic conflicts are a subset of civil wars. -- Black Falcon 22:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the way the article is organized is just funny.--Sefringle 04:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and "Userfy" I like that term - thanks!. This article has potential, but it does read like a work in progress.... - NDCompuGeek 14:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.