Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intrinsic flame instabilities
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Combustion instability. Daniel (talk) 19:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Intrinsic flame instabilities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
page does not have any indication of notability. at the very least, draftify DrowssapSMM (say hello) 18:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. DrowssapSMM (say hello) 18:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to flame. The topic does seem borderline notable as the topic of a review or two (one linked in the article), but is a hyper-niche subject that probably is not well served by its own article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Combustion instability, deleting current content. That seems to cover the topic far better. I suggest a redirect to the full article rather than a subsection, although the latter would also work. Ldm1954 (talk) 08:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Combustion instability, per Ldm. Article content is virtually duplicated from what is already there. Fermiboson (talk) 11:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.