Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intro-Inspection
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to Osymyso (nothing to merge because all relevant info already there). Angr/talk 14:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you say this is verifiable only because of half-a-line in the New York Times that doesn't even say the song's title (See this link), then I still say this fails Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines/Songs. Delete -- Perfecto 08:05, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge I could be convinced that this belongs on Osymyoso, but the song certainly doesn't need its own page. --djrobgordon 08:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Songs don't need their own articles -- Alpha269 16:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now. If the article on Osymyso himself gets fleshed out enough, the page could be moved to List of songs used in Intro-Inspection, but, even as I type that, it seems less useful than it is now. --Flatluigi 03:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Create an Osymyso page and merge it into there.-PlasmaDragon 17:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I was bold and just did that myself.-PlasmaDragon 18:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.