Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Introducing Ke$ha
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ke$ha. JForget 21:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Introducing Ke$ha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
User:Chzz posted a PROD, and that PROD was contested. He asked on IRC if we could bring it here. Chzz's reason for the PROD was "Song lacks independent notability, per WP:NSONG." GrooveDog (talk) 11:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral - This is undoubtedly a bad article, however with some sourcing and wikifying I believe it could be cleaned up. GrooveDog (talk) 11:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a single source for the entire article. Not one statement has been verified with a reliable source, or indeed any source at all. A future album with no refs and no assertion of notability. --Mask? 11:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an editor who endorsed Chzz's PROD. MacMedtalkstalk 14:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Album by notable artist (artist notability is contested, however, I believe it's established). Strip it down to verifiable information though. Gigs (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't find any sources confirming the track listing. No notability as far as I can see. If we stripped it down to verifiable information, there would be nothing left. No prejudice against recreating when it gains notability and verifiability. talkingbirds 22:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - fails WP:CRYSTAL at the moment, with no references provided... redirect to artist's article until a later date when album has been released and is notable... - Adolphus79 (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Classic case for WP:CRYSTAL. If in the future the album gets significant RS coverage per WP:NSONG, then it can be recreated. LK (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per me Chzz ► 03:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.