- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--JForget 01:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Intuitive Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a collection of stuff made up one day. An article on "intuitive" game rules and gameplay might be workable (if highly prone to authorial POV), but this article only covers one specific "intuitive" game that was invented by the article's creator(s). -Sean Curtin (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a place for stuff you make up out of the blue, and with no sources. asenine say what? 08:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems like pretty clear example of WP:OR/WP:MADEUP to me. Olaf Davis | Talk 10:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, it's either a made-up game or a game invented by a couple of kids DarkZorro 12:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. — Wenli (reply here) 01:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Asenine comments, a suitable article on impromptu games of this sort might be written (There are books on childrens' games that could be used for proper sourcing.), but this is not a reasonable start. DGG (talk) 04:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.