Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inward Expressionism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G7) by Anthony Bradbury. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inward Expressionism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable art trend created by a non-notable artist. PROD removed by creator after redirect to artist's articlr was reversed. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Multiple searches, including Highbeam which includes significant art publications, turn up nothing to indicate that this is a noted art term/movement. Fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Entirely non-notable, borderline WP:MADEUP. Like with its creator, I can't find any independent sources at all discussing the subject. Kolbasz (talk) 13:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.