Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iowa State Chess Association (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa State Chess Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This essentially unreferenced article currently has WP:BRANCH issues. Dolotta (talk) 13:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 14:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 14:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 14:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. Sophia91 (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to United States Chess Federation. Fails WP:GNG. Per nom, I do not believe there is any need for state chess associations to have their own articles.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Even if it passed, we would have a notable subject with an empty article, since none of it is based on third party sources. Opposed to redirecting as the USCF article makes no mention of this, even via a list. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.