Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Default keep since the consensus is not a delete. Tone 13:35, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. Not clear that it is independently notable. Perhaps better merged into Coalition Provisional Authority Rathfelder (talk) 15:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 15:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge as suggested because the article does include references, although it does not present them properly. Mccapra (talk) 02:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. This is not the correct forum to discuss a merger. The nominator should withdraw the AFD amd discuss a merger on the article's talk page.4meter4 (talk) 03:16, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.