Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irrational design
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Irrational design (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced, very short article about a (proprietary?) design theory that is currently in development. I am unable to find any reliable sources with which to establish notability. Fails WP:MADEUP. - MrX 11:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - MrX 11:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources, and only seems to be mentioned on the website listed in the article, which is non-notable per WP:WEB. Captain Conundrum (talk) 12:18, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of significance. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 19:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet N or GNG, stub is too small to be of use. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.