Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irrefutable Truths of Life

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:MADEUP and WP:SNOW delete. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irrefutable Truths of Life

I'm nominating this because.... let me count the reasons. Firstly I cannot put my finger on an appropriate speedy, although clearly made up &c might do. If it had any text I'd PROD it as an essay, then probably AfD it after the article creator removed the PROD. rationale??? unencyclopedic nonsense. To put it politely.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator, who has indeed put it politely. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as "What the hell is this?" isn't a valid rationale, I'd better say that it appears to be a list with no specified inclusion criteria. Yeah, that sounds possible. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; I'm pretty sure it falls under WP:NOTESSAY, in that the author is advancing controversial personal opinions about the nature of value, and notwithstanding the fact that the author hasn't provided arguments supporting these opinions. FourViolas (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unencyclopedic and unsourced - Speedy needs a criterion for "clearly shouldn't be here, but doesn't fit the other criteria" - Arjayay (talk) 18:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:OR and fails WP:V because some of those "truths" are damn lies. Jack N. Stock (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A11 (minor stretch, but I think it applies), or else SNOW delete as unencyclopedic.Tazerdadog (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete essay/made up. not encyclopedic IdreamofJeanie (talk) 22:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.