Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Bell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Disambiguation page was moved to this title per TenPoundHammer's suggestion. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Bell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Isaac Bell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources or significant coverage. It doesn't seem notable at all, and it isn't normal to merge it into the article for the book, so I'm nominating the article for deletion. Analog Horror, (Speak) 01:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, no out-of universe notability asserted. If done, move Isaac Bell (disambiguation) to this title. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. SerTanmay (talk) 08:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the first thing notable is almost always a work, except when a character has appear so often in so many works that a few of the works they appear in are non-notable. Here there is no notability outside the underlying works. Wikipedia's most overabundant articles are probably on fictional characters, although by percentage we may have the most unneeded articles on fictional things, places and organizations, since those are even less likely to be notable than fictional characters. These articles also have insane longevity, like Barahir.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.