Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac More

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Disregarding unsubstantiated arguments and minding a lack of specificity regarding where editors searched to prove there is no coverage, I don't think it would be useful or fruitful to relist this discussion. Consensus is to delete. czar ⨹ 16:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac More

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third-party sources to establish notability; appears promotional as well since it was originally copied from Linkedin. Wizardman 01:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 01:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as per above. smileguy91^talk 01:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. JimVC3 (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (prattle) @ 22:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He's new in the media industry, I am sure the article will improve over the years 169.202.5.160 (talk) 11:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep help improve this article Letlhogomokwena (talk) 12:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability, no coverage. --Michig (talk) 08:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.