- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ishfaq Mughal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP. In addition, text does not signify why the subject is particularly notable. Creator suggests article was created by the subject. Possible speedy candidate under CSD A7, but due to age has been brought here instead. Gazimoff 15:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The subject is a journalist; I therefore examined the article with the criteria at WP:CREATIVE in mind. This reporter, to the best of my knowledge, meets none of the criteria laid out at WP:CREATIVE; moreover, this article does not assert that its subject meets any of the criteria laid out at WP:CREATIVE. An unsourced BLP to boot. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.