Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Azad University of Rasht
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 02:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Islamic Azad University of Rasht (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
delete then translate - cannot check whether wrong/harmful/offensive due to notenglish Vzmi 12:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone is willing to translate within a reasonable length of time. Impossible to decide notability or anything else until we know what it says. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural keep Typically, we do things the other way around. This had only been listed at PNT for a day before the tag was removed. Usually we don't send those articles to AfD for two weeks. Since I have no idea what the text says, I'd suggest keeping it for now. If it doesn't get translated within two weeks, it should be nominated again. I have also readded the appropriate tag. --S up? 14:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I totally agree with S. --- A. L. M. 14:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural keep per User:S. Procedure should be followed. -Yupik 18:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural keep per User:S. Also editors should be aware that speedy criterion WP:CSD#G1 specifically excludes non-English pages. I speak limited Farsi; the page doesn't contain anything damaging, just date of founding, a brief description, and a list of some university officials. Relist if I or someone else doesn't get around to this in two weeks after the listing date at WP:PNT. cab 00:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have restubbed the article as it is a copyvio of [1] (this is from the university's official homepage). cab 00:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.