Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isn't This Supposed to Be Fun!?
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. The album has not charted or been mentioned in non-trivial press. If the band becomes more notable in the future, then this album will be more notable. Keilana 04:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Isn't This Supposed to Be Fun!? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod, so here we are. Simply releasing one single album does not meet WP:MUSIC, without charts, awards, etc. to indicate notability. Ravenna1961 (talk) 02:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. jj137 ♠ Talk 03:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and note: I have removed review-like section, and found nothing useful. I enjoyed that with song titles like "War" and "Fed to the Fire", the album upholds a reputation for having "buoyant melodies, scintillating synth and quirky lyrics for an energetic and rollicking, energetic good time." J-ſtanTalkContribs 04:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Releasing their debut on the world's largest independent record label Epitaph Records more than qualifies per WP:MUSIC. tomasz. 10:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. As does their national tour. tomasz. 11:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't think their tour qualifies as a national tour. They're going to nine cities (6 states) in nine days on the eastern seaboard, never extending any farther west than Georgia. --Cyrus Andiron 16:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. WP:MUSIC requires two albums on a "more important" indie label. They've only got one. Bondegezou (talk) 14:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless some refs can be found to establish notability- charts, etc per nom.Epthorn (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have now added cites for two articles about the band and the album, from Alternative Press and from Teen. Keep. --Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 06:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.