Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isotopic ratio outlier analysis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isotopic ratio outlier analysis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Isotopic ratio outlier analysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence is presented that this is a notable scientific technique. The sources are primary literature from the inventor and from a commercial enterprise. Tdslk (talk) 16:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Looks like most of it is copyrighted content from the website linked in the article. Thtatithticth (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:OR and WP:COPYVIO. Interesting as this looks, we just don't publish original research, and we strictly apply copyright law -- and in 2020, everybody knows that. Bearian (talk) 00:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.