Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli Juggling Convention
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Israeli Juggling Convention (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No claim to notability other than what appears to be an OR claim to the highest juggler per capita ratio in the world (don't know how you measure that exactly). Don't see how it could be expanded beyond it's sub-stubby state since I don't believe there's much you can really say on the subject. If anyone can read Hebrew and fancies a stab at sourcing this, I'd be delighted if someone could find grounds to keep it — iridescenti (talk to me!) 00:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per OR. Also per the fact that, once again, I missed it. the_undertow talk 02:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Juggling convention eh? Delete per WP:N MartinDK 03:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as pure original research. Sr13 (T|C) 03:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Needs sources that rise to WP:RS to establish noteworthiness. Quadzilla99 10:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, does not appear to be fit for any encyclopedia. RFerreira 04:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, too much OR and not encyclopedic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tim.bounceback (talk • contribs) 12:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.