Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli plan to occupy and flatten all of Gaza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. WP:SNOW The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli plan to occupy and flatten all of Gaza

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Name is not official, leaves this article open to POV problems. Information seems to be a fork of Gaza war#Post-war plans. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 13:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 13:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Obvious POV problems — Czello ^(music) 13:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Israel, and Palestine. Shellwood (talk) 13:39, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: POV issues, and for the 4 lines of text, this can be incorporated into an article on the war. Not sure this is notable enough for a stand-alone article. Oaktree b (talk) 14:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above. Mooonswimmer 14:09, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: POV problems, far too specific a topic. Any content of merit can be (neutrally) included in Gaza war#Israeli leaders' plans. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 15:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:SPECULATION. Israel may or may not have a plan. But until it comes to fruition, it's just one more speculation about an ever changing situation in the middle east. — Maile (talk) 16:11, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: POV issues. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 16:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:CRYSTAL and POV issues. Worgisbor (congregate) 16:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: While we can probably make an article covering the government's intentions of expulsion, dispossession and conquest, with appearances of the opinions of (self-described) fascists like Smotrich, having the article title as it currently is would not pass. If we are to create such an article, draft spacing it first so we have something substantially written to put out would be the best course of action, in my opinion. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Delete, This is a bad fork with some pretty obvious issues with point of view and a near-WP:PEACOCK title. -Samoht27 (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. This is an obvious WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NPOV violation. MidnightMayhem 03:16, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per almost everyone above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as POV regarding the Gaza war. We do have articles discussing every aspect of this war. Do not redirect as even the name is POV. gidonb (talk) 05:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. The topic is highly notable but WP:SPLIT is unjustified; the content should be integrated into existing relevant articles. Probably a sentence or two can go into the section Gaza genocide#Genocidal intent and/or Palestinian genocide accusation. If Crampcomes has kept the wikisource, then there won't be much practical difference between a delete and a merger - a plain copy/paste won't make sense in any case. If there is no opposition at Talk:Palestinian genocide accusation, then creating a new 5th level ===== sub^4-section there would likely be justified. Boud (talk) 12:36, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to whatever the main article covering the topic is. MarioGom (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Maile66 as pure Crystal speculation. There is basically one source that this alleged plan was leaked. There is actually a plan by Donald Trump to do this, which is well-sourced and is not a POV fork. The ADL is already on our case. We don't need more fodder for the New York Post gunning to take away the Wikimedia Foundation's charitable status. Bearian (talk) 08:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with Cdjp1 that while this article provides some helpful content, it is still not suitable to stand as a separate article. There are too many POV issues. Raymond3023 (talk) 11:39, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NPOV. No evidence that the plan referred to actually exists. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:45, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is definitely a case of WP:SPECULATION, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:NPOV. There is no evidence that this is actually happening. Definitely does not warrant its own page. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NPOV. Biased speculation. ☩ ^{(Babysharkboss2)} 18:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is likely WP:SNOW-worthy now. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 19:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think so too, however it's a bit late here. Can someone else ask an admin to close this? I need to get up early tomorrow for my job.

Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 20:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.