Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivy Latimer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ivy Latimer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ivy Latimer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Existing refs are non-independent, non-significant, or non-secondary. Souped-up find-sources sans social media:

• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

I see nothing here that is reliable, except a passing mention in the Australian Television Information Archive which is not enough to establish notability. Mathglot (talk) 11:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Australia, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Pinging users with >5% of added text: @Me Da Wikipedian, 99aquamarine, RoxySaunders, Jackmcbarn, and Sedgewren:. Mathglot (talk) 11:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Ping Hammersoft who I recall discussing this with. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (talk • stalk) 14:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Mathglot All I did was revert some vandalism on that page... Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 12:13, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete She played a mermaid in a spin-off of a children's series and was dropped in series 2. Beyond socials there is nothing, entirely lacking WP:SIGCOV and doesn't pass GNG let alone specifics like NACTOR. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. My sole fixation on the article is due to Latimer coming out as a trans man on his since-deleted Instagram. I feel very awkward and invasive about my efforts to document and verify that fact, given that by 2020 he was clearly a private citizen, and I have no idea how he'd feel being outed on a WP page written by fans of a mermaid show he did years ago. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (talk • stalk) 14:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• SPEEDY Can this go G3, then? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• No it can't. Not even remotely close. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  SORRY @Duffbeerforme! Meant G7... (G3? What was I thinking?) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.