Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J-Walk Blog (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:52, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- J-Walk Blog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no significant coverage. This was kept in the 2005 AfD as assumed as notable and in the 2006 AfD because of Google hits. Fails WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No relevant independent sources have been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*poke* 00:28, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable enough. Corn cheese (talk) 01:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.