- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- JAGE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable personal software project. Judging from the username and content, the article appears to have been created by the software's author. Google search revealed only three non-encyclopedia links about the software: the same message board post referenced in the article (written by the author), another message board post in which the software is listed in a user's signature (possibly the author?), and an entry on AcronymFinder.com. Ringbang (talk) 19:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; checked into it; no RS Chzz ► 23:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No sources, no assertion of notability. Tevildo (talk) 10:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. In fact, there's almost no coverage even in unreliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 13:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.