- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- JEMRIS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No assertion of notability Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 16:22, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. A code library, just like any other software product, needs some notability to merit an article. I can't find any. No reviews of it either directly or via other products that use this one. DMacks (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 01:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – I cannot find anything that can establish any notability for this. MuZemike 06:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.