Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JEM Management Corp. (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 16:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JEM Management Corp.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the rationale for an article is their connection to the finger incident. this has literally nothing to do with them in terms of their notability. an article on the incident wont fly, so why should they have an article. a section in another article may fly Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Simply still not solidly notable it seems, a local company owning some major restaurant locations. SwisterTwister talk 06:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete The notability is too remote. DGG ( talk ) 01:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.