Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JESUS WAS BLACK!!!!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied. --Golbez 19:21, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Utter nonsense. KHM03 18:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. - KHM03 18:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and should have been speedy as nonsense. CambridgeBayWeather 18:41, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per A something. Sonic Mew | talk to me 18:45, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no content whatsoever and no potential. Punkmorten 18:50, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• STRONG KEEP BECAUSE I BELIEVE IT!Molotov (talk)
  18:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• • --Not in the form written now, but the belief and paradigm of a black Jesus SHOULD BE EXPRESSED somewhere in this encyclopedia. Molotov (talk)
    18:53, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. Molotov, oh Molotov. --JJay 18:55, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy G1 or A1. --howcheng [ talk • contribs • web ] 18:58, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this, but agree with Molotov to the extent that there should be an article that discusses this, apart from the snippets in Jesus and Images of Jesus.  BD2412 ^talk 19:16, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• No use wasting the community's time with this, it was always a speedy candidate.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.