• Home
  • Random
  • Nearby
  • Log in
  • Settings
Donate Now If Wikipedia is useful to you, please give today.
  • About Wikipedia
  • Disclaimers
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JIMMY

  • Project page
  • Talk
  • Language
  • Watch
  • Edit
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Esteffect 02:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JIMMY

edit
  • This is just pure nonsense. I don't see any good way to make this into a real article. Strong Delete. Georgia guy 01:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as neologism. "it is the hope of the founding partners that JIM becomes a thorough part of the American lexicon and it is heard in multi-media use" means "We made this up one day, it's completely unsourced, and we want to use Wikipedia to promote it." --Elkman - (talk) 01:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as above. Metamagician3000 01:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not nonsense, it's just a silly joke. Delete per User:Elkman. — Hillel 01:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • "A Wikipedia entry that makes no sense" should be Jimmified. Er, I mean deleted. Zetawoof(ζ) 01:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • After reading this, I feel that I've been jimmied(sp). Nah, I am sticking with duped. Delete junyor 01:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete why was this even up for deletion? I can't believe it wasn't just immediately deleted outright without a vote. Honestly, who would vote to keep this page? Even Jimmy doesn't want it to survive that much. -- Kicking222 01:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi Kicking. Because (although it seems that User:Hahnchen below disagrees with me on that point) this article does not clearly match any speedy deletion criteria. According to guidelines, hoaxes and implausible theories (and ridiculous claims like the ones in this article) are not considered candidates for speedy deletion and have to follow the afd route. — Hillel 02:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy - Nonsense, rubbish, hoax. - Hahnchen 02:09, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/JIMMY&oldid=1137937980"
Last edited on 7 February 2023, at 04:40

Languages

      This page is not available in other languages.

      Wikipedia
      • Wikimedia Foundation
      • Powered by MediaWiki
      • This page was last edited on 7 February 2023, at 04:40 (UTC).
      • Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.
      • Privacy policy
      • About Wikipedia
      • Disclaimers
      • Contact Wikipedia
      • Code of Conduct
      • Developers
      • Statistics
      • Cookie statement
      • Terms of Use
      • Desktop