- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mgm|(talk) 10:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- JLearnIt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Why is this encyclopedic? Recently created at various wikiprojects so also a promotion attempt. Please also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JLearnItME. - Simeon (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The subject per se is perfectly encyclopaedic. However, it seems to fail notability as there are no third party references, nor could I turn any up - all sites I could find were merely offering it for download. I42 (talk) 17:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I did find this, but that's not enough to show notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.