- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- JMC Blue Dwarf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails WP:WEB. The subject of the article has not been covered by multiple non-trivial sources. Nv8200p talk 01:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Much as I love the subject matter, this is nowhere near WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:WEB. --Evb-wiki 01:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:WEB. Oysterguitarist 01:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete barring the inclusion of any sort of WP:RS indicating notability per WP:WEB, of which I can find none. --Kinu t/c 03:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not quite notable, doesn't fitt the criteria for notability nor reliable resources. Wikidudeman (talk) 11:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Bart133 (t) (c) 17:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll go for a delete due to lack of sources and dubious notability. Stifle (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.