Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JWChat (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JWChat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This software appears to fail WP:GNG. The only source that actually discusses this software above the level of trivial coverage is Linux.com article (already in the article). The rest of sources I could find either don't even try to discuss this software as opposed to general concept of AJAX-based jabber client. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 08:39, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 16:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Tough call, but the linux.com article is the only non-marginal source, and that's just not enough to meet WP:NSOFT. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 07:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.